As
noted in the Huffington Post, "The Romney
campaign told Grenell to 'be quiet and not to speak up until it went away,'
said a source familiar with the matter, referring to criticism of his sexual
orientation." The "IT" that had to "go away" was the
religious right's vicious reaction to Romney daring to work with a gay man.
Then the Romney campaign bowed to the religious right they told Richard Grenell -- working for them -- to
shut up. Their token gay man had to keep his mouth shut to appease the bigots.
As the New York Times noted:
"The day after Mr. Grenell was hired, Bryan Fischer, a Romney critic with the American Family Association, told nearly 1,400 followers on Twitter: "If personnel is policy, his message to the pro-family community: drop dead." The next day, the conservative Daily Caller published an online column that summed up the anger of the Christian right, linking Mr. Grenell's hiring to the appointment of gay judges to the New Jersey Supreme Court."
...
which brings up the context of the Romney punch-the-token-gay fiasco...
If
you came to earth from another planet right now as the proverbial "visitor
from Mars" and tried to figure out what most religions all seem agree on
and care about most you'd conclude that it was about keeping women down and
bashing gays. Call this the "ecumenism of oppression."
From
the pope slapping down American nuns for being
too tolerant to the rise of the incidence of woman abuse by
Islamist fundamentalists in Turkey, to Orthodox Jews in Israel spitting on young female children who
are wearing dresses that are "too short" to the American Roman
Catholic bishops working with far right evangelicals (like the late Chuck Colson) to redefine
depriving women of access to contraception and depriving gays of rights to
marry as "religious liberty" issues...
one message is loud and clear: Fundamentalist religion of all kinds fears women
and gays.
(By
the way ever wonder how anything can be called a civil rights issue when it is about
depriving someone else of their civil rights?)
The
worldwide practice mostly in Islamic "conservative" countries of
mutilating women by slicing off their
clitoris' so they may be "protected" from sexual pleasure, the hubris
of the Roman Catholic Church that has wrapped up a fifty year period of presiding over a network of pedophiles
only to make the pope that protected the institution rather than the
children - John Paul II - a "saint," the bashing of gays in the
anti-gay marriage surge of activity.... none of this would be believed unless
it actually happened.
It
did happen. It is happening. It is politics raw and naked power
politics at that masquerading as religion.
It
just seems so ludicrous that religion of all things should be the leading voice
to deprive people of human rights. And that the people leading the charge are
the same people that have also been fighting of legal suits over decades of
child abuse and other multitudes of hypocrisy only makes the situation all the
more tragic.
Frederick
Douglass writes in "An American Slave" (Chapter 9) a good example of everything that is wrong
with relying on religion instead of on your heart. When it comes to justifying
bad behavior Captain Auld reminds me of today's Roman Catholic bishops, the
evangelical anti-gay activists and the women haters in Islamic countries:
"In August, 1832, my master [Captain Auld] attended a Methodist camp-meeting held in the Bay-side, Talbot county, and there experienced religion. I indulged a faint hope that his conversion would lead him to emancipate his slaves, and that, if he did not do this, it would, at any rate, make him more kind and humane. I was disappointed in both these respects. It neither made him to be humane to his slaves, nor to emancipate them. If it had any effect on his character, it made him more cruel and hateful in all his ways; for I believe him to have been a much worse man after his conversion than before."
If
you asked the visitor from Mars who this Jesus was that these misogynists from
Captain Auld to today's bishops were "following" based on the
evidence of their actions he'd conclude that Jesus must have founded an
anti-woman child abuse cult to replace (or augment) the cult of racism and
slavery that similar white men propagated before them. The Martian visitor might also note that
these child-abusers and women haters and gay-bashers have an odd habit of telling
everyone else what to do while they seem to have no ethical rules at all.
How
odd it is that if you read about what the actual Jesus said and who his friends
were (powerless women and outcasts) you'd conclude that he was a revolutionary
in his patriarchal times and a pro-woman and pro-child leader in every
instance.
Can
you really picture Jesus defining religious liberty as the right to deprive
women and gay men and women of their basic rights to employment, marriage
equality and family planning?
Jesus
healed on the Sabbath just to piss off the "bishops" of his time. He
took the side of the woman adulteress against the "popes" of his day.
He hung out with whores when "good men" didn't do that and in a time
when treating women as equals was as unlikely then as it would be now for
conservatives to accept the fact that to be born gay or female is as normal as
to be heterosexual or male and as God-blessed too. I don't see Jesus telling
Richard Grenell to shut up in order to keep the religious leaders and other
bigots happy!
Between
the Roman Catholic anti-contraception, anti gay marriage bishops, the Islamic
fundamentalists mutilating their daughters and the American evangelicals trying
to force women to have children they don't want (and trying to force Romney to
join the religious right) our visitor from Mars will fly home with the news
that religion of the bishops', pope, Islamists, and evangelicals is really a
misogyny/homophobic cult. He might also report that this cult of hate and fear
is also a practitioner of politics masquerading as religion.
8 comments:
I must say Rev Sharpton is not my cup of tea on a lot of things but I do appreciate that he had you on his show...that is I had forgotten about your change of heart (in a very literal sense) and the many interesting things you have said regarding working on the fringe of the right. I don't like any of it...but I really do like that folks like you stand up and say something. Good luck and hopefully more folks will stand up and take some arrows for the doing the right thing. Mike McManus
Hi Mike, Thanks for reading the piece and watching my MSNBC segment,Best, Frank
This is all about male sexual insecurity, and, in the case of the RC hierarchy, intense frustration.
"Jesus healed on the Sabbath just to piss off the "bishops" of his time."
Jewish law has always permitted healing on the Sabbath. There is the concept of pikuah nefesh, saving a life, that takes precedence over all other Jewish laws.
Jesus was not as revolutionary as you make him out to be. He was in the mainstream of a certain branch of Judaism of his time.
I have a question for you Frank. Don't the Orthodox churches have the same beliefs as the Catholic church on women and Gays?
Also, the Orthodox churches have never had the equivalent of Vatican II on issues relating to Jews. They have a history of persecution that I don't believe they have ever addressed. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Obama has come out in support of gay marriage. This is nothing short of a declaration of war. If you think the Right was crazy before, just wait. Obama must think he can win. Perhaps he thinks he's totally lost the far Right but he might mobilize the Left enough to offset them.
Post a Comment